Use Actions: from a problem to an approved change

Section 1

Follow the four-step path

Priorities come from available evidence. The path separates changes on your site, work involving external sources and what needs measuring afterwards.

1. Priorities: open an intervention and read the issue, evidence, planned work and owner.
2. Page by page: use the index or Page to review to select a page. Check its issues and text proposed from approved facts; use the index to reach the other pages.
3. Off site: read the external source and proposed activity before deciding whether to proceed.
4. Verify: compare subsequent observations on the same questions and check the comparison’s coverage.

Section 2

Approve the content and destination

Open the proposal line by line and read its sources and change. Applying it requires permissions and a usable connection, or a declared manual publication. If a step costs money, read its quote and cap and give the required consent before execution.

Approve or reject after reviewing. The path’s tools help prepare and apply the work: open them from the intervention when needed.

Section 3

Check the receipt, then the result

The receipt documents execution; rereading checks the published page. A later comparison observes the effect. These steps remain distinct: a published change does not guarantee better answers.

If execution is blocked or uncertain, read the reason and receipt before retrying. To assess the effect, keep questions, assistants and periods comparable.