Subject
What was observed: answer, page, conversation or activity.
Glossary
Understand what each observation measures before comparing brands or deciding how to act.
What you get
A useful definition clarifies what is counted, which sources are included and what cannot be inferred. Read every metric alongside its period, market, language and sample design.
What you get
Count eligible items in the selected corpus after attribution and deduplication. This is a count of observations, not the total number of people who saw or discussed your brand.
What you get
Show positive, neutral, negative and mixed classifications alongside unclassified items. State the classified denominator: missing classification does not become neutral sentiment.
What you get
Search presence is the share of complete, eligible observations in which your brand appears; average best position considers only those where it is present. Engines remain separate. Query, market and device define the comparison, while incomplete observations are excluded rather than converted into brand absence.
What you get
AI measures are calculated from complete, eligible answers, retaining provider, engine, model and prompt version. The denominator is visible. For example, ten mentions in twenty answers describe presence in that sample; they do not estimate how many people encountered your brand in assistant conversations.
What you get
Perceived trust concerns expectations associated with a brand through documented experiences and communication: quality, consistency, support and transparency may contribute differently. It is not a financial index. Observed sources provide signals about these dimensions without representing everyone’s opinion or producing a universal trust percentage.
What you get
A citation refers to a source, while a recommendation expresses a preference in relation to the question. They are distinct signals. An answer may name a brand without citing its website, or cite a page without recommending its product; measures therefore retain separate counts and context.
What you get
Use the same channels, markets and time intervals for your brand and competitors. If scope changes, describe the difference alongside the comparison.
What you get
A story reproduced by several publications or a repeated URL may appear in multiple places. Check duplicates and source independence before treating repeated mentions as separate experiences.
What you get
Use consistent question sets for the brands compared. Separate results from different providers, models and prompt versions. An API answer does not automatically represent the consumer interface, a personalised session or questions asked by real users.
Using definitions
An indicator becomes useful when you know what it counts, its denominator and exclusions. Definitions help you read measures without giving them a broader meaning.
In TrustInsider, the sample accompanies the measure: valid answers, deduplicated articles and observed queries describe different sets. Comparing periods requires compatible objects and criteria. The following definitions extend glossary terms into an interpretation method.
What was observed: answer, page, conversation or activity.
Which items are eligible for calculation and which are excluded.
Period, language, market and method that make the measure interpretable.
Informed comparisons
Presence, traffic and reputation may be connected in an analysis, but they are not interchangeable. Each indicator answers a precise question.
A brand may be widely cited because of an issue; a visible page may receive few clicks; an AI answer may mention a product without recommending it. The table clarifies these differences before results are compared.
| Terms | Difference | Interpretation example |
|---|---|---|
| Mention and recommendation | Being named does not mean being recommended. | The model mentions two alternatives but suggests one. |
| Visibility and traffic | Appearing does not mean receiving a visit. | The page appears in results; clicks are a separate measure. |
| Change and effect | A change does not prove a cause. | The sample improves after a change, but checks are needed. |
Related paths
Check your brand’s presence, compare results or choose content improvements: continue with the feature you need.
From the question to checking the outcome: context, sources, hypotheses and action plans in the TrustInsider analytical workflow.
ReadTrustInsider’s criteria for interpreting reputation and trust: provenance, samples, reviews and the limits of conclusions.
ReadFind guides, FAQs and methodology to clarify indicators, coverage and access, with dedicated routes for data requests.
Read