Recipients
Who may read the report and for which purpose.
Reputation reports
Bring mentions and topics to your team meeting.
Share a report on your brand’s mentions and topics. Export a readable, printable document or a JSON file, including the period, counts and references to workspace evidence.
Your brand · plans and responsibilities
PlanEvidenceVerification
From evidence to review
To review
Check the cited source
Compare the cited information with current documentation.
ProductDraft
Clarify compatibility
Prepare an update with references and reasons for the changes.
MarketingAwaiting approval
Define the follow-up check
Agree on a period and sample for reviewing answers after the action.
Brand owner
A saved proposal remains distinct from an action carried out. Approval applies to the version reviewed and the owner’s permissions.
What you get
A summary you can verify.
Select a brand and period to bring mention volume, sentiment distribution and reviewed topics into one document. For example, a returns summary helps the team choose which questions to clarify in the FAQ and which cases to refer to support.
- Stated scope
- Brand, sources, period and criteria used to select observations.
- Traceable conclusions
- Definitions, denominators and evidence let you trace a result back to its basis.
- Reasoned decisions
- Proposals, missing information and responsibilities clarify the next step; recipients and rights define sharing boundaries.
What you get
Publish research together with its limits.
When at least three compatible cycles are available, prepare an observational study: state the question, observed population, sampling and limitations. The protocol distinguishes prospective registration from retrospective analysis of existing data. Editions compare available matching questions and conditions, with readable numerators and denominators.
Review the edition before approving it. Public release needs a second confirmation of the exact preview and rights to display aggregates from every involved source. The page shows method, period, charts and tables, without raw answers or workspace identifiers. If rights expire or you withdraw the edition, the page is no longer available. Results describe the sample, not causality or representation of the entire market.
| Step | What you check | Usable result |
|---|---|---|
| Protocol | Stated question, population and method | Explicit prospective or retrospective design |
| Edition | At least three compatible cycles | Aggregates, coverage and excluded observations |
| Public page | Approved preview and current rights | Authorized method and results without private corpus |
Summary and detail
A clear interpretation. Sources at hand.
Export a summary of reviewed brand mentions and associated topics. Use counts, sentiment and sample context to explain which issues the team should investigate.
Choose a mentions and topics report, or a work report containing the selected AI and Search samples and action plans. Each authorised report is available as a readable, printable document or data file, with the context, sources and limits of the included material.
- Decision summary
- Detailed evidence
- Permitted attachments
Report structure
From results to the next decisions.
The report retains the sample’s brand, period, market and language alongside its mention summary. Reviewed topics add the subjects to discuss with content, product and support teams.
Check observed mentions, classifications and excluded content before using a percentage in a briefing. Report references identify evidence and its rights; return to the workspace and accessible sources to read original content.
| Part | What it contains | What it is for |
|---|---|---|
| Sample summary | Period, market, language, counts and sentiment distribution. | Share the same data basis before discussing priorities. |
| Evidence references | Evidence identifiers, revisions and rights references. | Find the observations behind the summary in the workspace. |
| Reviewed topics | Topics associated with mentions and classification status. | Choose topics to investigate before preparing an improvement. |
Controlled sharing
The right document. The right people.
An internal report and externally distributed material may require different content. Recipients, rights and personal information determine which evidence may be included.
Before sharing, check export rights and which information the recipient needs. The report states its preparation date, analysed period and source validity. Downloading the document does not extend usage rights for included material.
Material
Which excerpts, references and details may be used outside the original view.
Version
The analysed period, preparation date and source validity.
Related paths
Choose your next step.
Check your brand’s presence, compare results or choose content improvements: continue with the feature you need.
Explore every intelligence tool
Choose the tools to see where your brand is found and where it is missing.
ReadFrom question to action
From the question to checking the outcome: context, sources, hypotheses and action plans in the TrustInsider analytical workflow.
ReadA transparent method, not a black box
TrustInsider’s criteria for interpreting reputation and trust: provenance, samples, reviews and the limits of conclusions.
ReadFind the right answer
Find guides, FAQs and methodology to clarify indicators, coverage and access, with dedicated routes for data requests.
Read