Discover
Which solutions are suggested for a problem the product solves?
Understanding AI visibility
Define questions, models and markets before interpreting a visibility measure.
Your brand · answers and sources
Which headphones do you recommend for working in a noisy office?
Example: a customer asks which headphones to choose for work. Open the answer to see whether your brand appears, which competitors are named and which pages are cited. Use this to identify information to clarify on your website.
Prepare a proposal to update the product page, then repeat the check using the same questions.
Mentions, recommendations and citations describe distinct signals: they are not added together. The denominator includes only valid answers, with the model and collection method stated.
What you get
The question sample should represent the intentions relevant to your team: learning about a category, comparing alternatives or considering a purchase. Language and market remain explicit. Repeating observations at controlled intervals reveals differences, provided model changes are also recorded. Twenty prompts describe only those twenty observations.
| Intent | Question to represent | Signal to examine |
|---|---|---|
| Learn about the category | Which features matter when choosing this product or service? | Topics and criteria described, even when no brand is named. |
| Compare alternatives | Which differences emerge between solutions for the same need? | Presence, descriptions and sources, keeping comparison distinct from recommendation. |
| Evaluate a choice | Which offering is proposed for a defined need and context? | An explicit suggestion and reasoning within the answer, without extending them to every conversation. |
What you get
Build a first collection that can be read question by question. For each answer, note your brand’s presence, any recommendation and disclosed sources. The aggregate should let you return to a specific case worth checking, rather than stop at a percentage.
What you get
If a collection is interrupted, list the cases to repeat before interpreting absences. Record the time of the new attempt and retain one outcome according to the established criterion; choosing the most favourable answer would distort the sample.
Designing the observation
AI visibility monitoring starts with customer needs. A useful panel includes discovery, comparison and verification questions: it represents a decision journey, not just a list of searches that already contain the brand name.
Gather recurring questions from support, on-site search and sales conversations, removing personal and confidential information. Assign each an intent, market and language. Preserve the exact wording to repeat comparisons. A team-built panel is a designed sample: how often a question is run does not measure how many people actually ask it. Before starting the panel, check that the questions represent different needs rather than simple variations of the same sentence. Keep prompts that already name your brand separate: the expected presence of the name does not demonstrate spontaneous discovery.
Which solutions are suggested for a problem the product solves?
Which differences emerge when the customer evaluates relevant alternatives?
What is said about compatibility, support, conditions and limitations?
Understanding the sample
An answer may name your brand without recommending it, recommend it without citing one of its pages or cite a source that discusses it critically. These observations have different meanings and should be interpreted separately.
Record the question, usable answer and collection conditions. Engine, model, method, language and observation time accompany the result. Direct API answers, web-search-enabled APIs and consumer experiences remain separate groups. Failure to complete a request does not demonstrate your brand’s absence from the answer.
| Observation | What it describes | What it does not prove |
|---|---|---|
| Mention | Your brand appears in the observed text. | A recommendation, positive judgement or universal exposure. |
| Recommendation | The answer proposes your brand for the expressed need. | A purchase, conversion or stable model preference. |
| Citation | The answer provides a reference to a source. | Exclusive use of that source or its causal influence on the answer. |
From analysis to work
A useful comparison keeps controllable conditions stable and makes changes visible. Altering the questions alongside website content makes subsequent results harder to interpret.
Before the action, define which questions to repeat and which answers to examine. If the model or collection method changes, start a separate comparison. Connect actions to evidence: missing information, outdated documentation or imprecisely described differences. Subsequent sampling measures what can be observed; it does not guarantee future citations or causal attribution.
Related paths
Check your brand’s presence, compare results or choose content improvements: continue with the feature you need.
Prepare an AI check, verify a citation and compare results: guides with examples to improve your brand’s content.
ReadFrom the question to checking the outcome: context, sources, hypotheses and action plans in the TrustInsider analytical workflow.
ReadTrustInsider’s criteria for interpreting reputation and trust: provenance, samples, reviews and the limits of conclusions.
ReadFind guides, FAQs and methodology to clarify indicators, coverage and access, with dedicated routes for data requests.
Read